(referred to in Mor Luce's minute) and in the letters of Gu last Emming 20 and 22 April directing him to Vyhradition the Attorney General's Thirion by the hearing of the St case without waiting for the issue of the paryay case interfered with the magistrate's discretion in an institutional manner and that he was undeservedly censured (1) for asking whether the letter 20 Apr. was to be regarded liberally on the action of the Government by order (2) for deprecating the interference of the Executive with his discretion in the conduct of the case (3) for reading in Court, the correspondence with the Colonial Secretary as an instance of improper interference of the A. G. - the order tendered a Li Lon the Chanore nelle proseque in the case of an official who was charged with subornation in repprence.
The 2nd & 3rd portions relate to the same extradition case. Mr Wodehouse's memorial transmitted the Lozellub. Best in the 4th portion, in his letter 6 June, Mr Wodehouse, though he preserves word against the decision of the O. A. G. to surrender the prisoner whom he had committed, submits that the action of the Government in informing the Magistrate has calculated to confuse the sunt reporting that the core magistrate and the auth the cause y to innocent people and asks for a clear definition of the duties of Magistrates under the Extradition Ordinances and the treaty of Tientsin.
As regards the 1st portion of the memorial, I should say, taking the matters in question in order: (1) that there was no undue interference with the magistrate on the part of the Executive in the latter cautioning the magistrates against unnecessary delay in dealing with extradition cases and stating the principles which, in the opinion of the Government, should guide the magistrates in dealing with such cases. (2) that the man to Wodehouse was wrong in adjourning the case charged with perging against the witness Lenny was disposed of. (3) that the O. A. G. interfered with the judicial functions of the magistrate in ordering him to resume the hearing of the case. That Mr Wodehouse was not to blame for asking whether the letter 20 Apr. (5) but Mr Wodehouse who did not deserve blame for deprecating in his letter the interference of the Executive with his conduct of the case.
(referred to in Mor Lucess minute) and in the
letters of
Gu
last
Emming
20 and 22
April directing him t
Vyhradition
the Attorney General's Thirion by the hearing of the St case witkent waiting for the issue of the paryay case interfred with the magistrate's discretion in an
6. the lineal surelany meinstitutional manner and that he was undeservedly concured (1) for asking whether the
letter
20 Apr.
war
was to be regarded
liber
01
30.12
am...
on the action of the Smirnment by
ader (2) for deprecating the interference o
the Executive with his discretion in the Conduct-
sabrach from
the case (3) for reading in Court, the conserpenden with the Colonial Secretary
ala
he ales Example fas
au
instance
improper
interference of the A. G - the ander tenter a
Li Lon the Chanore
nelle proseque in the case of official who was charged with subornate in q
perjung in repprence
The 2nd & 3rd pertinis z
the same extradition
relate to the his remont
feed
Me
Mr Wodeten's memorit
For wishing to portion the transmitted the Lozellub.
Best in the 4th portion _i ( his letter
6 June Mr Wodchenen,
F
hot
Laz
ጳ
thuugh he presepers
word against the decision of the
0. A. G. Le surrender the prisoner whom he had commited, submits that the action g the Groomment in pelle informing the Magistrate
has calculated to cenfone thi
sunt reporting
that Itu core magistrate andh the
auth the cause y
to innocent people
and arts for a chris
definition of the duties of Magistrales anders the Extradition adinances and the treng
of Tientsin
ths regards the 1 portion
of
memorial
90
I should suy-taking the
matters in question in ander
date
2
(1) that there was no undue interference.
イ
with the magistrate in the part of the 23 Febmag 2
hecutive in the latter
the magistrates against unne cautioning the magistrates
cessary delay in dealing with extradition cases and stating
and stating the principles which
in the opinion of the Government should guide the magistralis in dealing
such cases.
(2) that the man to Woodcheuse.
with
trad
unted the
prong in adjourning the case charpe of perging against the witness Lenny
disposed of
You
was
but (3) that the O. A.
be/31
G.
adici
interpred for for
with the judicial functions ofthe magistrate in ordering him to resume the hearing of
the case
that Mt Wrocheuse was
in his letter 22 Me
147
was
ว
A he's
did
ret demoing
д
order
the understood es
& blame for arking whether the slitter 20 Mil (5) Hut Mohrichease who did not deser
23 pe
Name for deprecating in his letter
7
the intreprence of the Execution with his Anduct of the case
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.